The prosecution stated that there was
no DNA or Forensic evidence.
Footprints were found behind the wall where the gunman was hiding.
DNA was found on the driver’s door of the Garda car.
DNA was found on a lighter at the alleged burn site.
To this day. No DNA has been identified.
Whilst this was mentioned in the original hearing it BAFFLES me that considering this entire case was based on circumstantial evidence.
Why WAS this detail not given more weight at the time of the verdict being considered ?
The DNA was investigated by specialists and found not to match Aaron, but the prosecution failed to mention this during the trial.
We should also note there was no murder weapon found and the valuables from the robbery were never recovered.