Following on from Lordship Credit Union to the alleged burn site here is a breakdown of Witness A’s observations and timelines. We will release a video on Witness B’s accounts in 48 hours’ time. As we drill into the evidence you will see how it is directly contradictive to itself and this evidence is questionable, to say the least, and does not allow any of this to make sense.

The prosecution stated that there was
no DNA or Forensic evidence.

Footprints

Footprints were found behind the wall where the gunman was hiding.

dna

DNA was found on the driver’s door of the Garda car.

FIRE

DNA was found on a lighter at the alleged burn site.

To this day. No DNA has been identified.

Whilst this was mentioned in the original hearing it BAFFLES me that considering this entire case was based on circumstantial evidence.

 

Why WAS this detail not given more weight at the time of the verdict being considered ?

The DNA was investigated by specialists and found not to match Aaron, but the prosecution failed to mention this during the trial.

We should also note there was no murder weapon found and the valuables from the robbery were never recovered. 

My son Aaron Brady is no saint, but the following evidence strongly suggests that he was wrongly convicted for a murder that he did not commit.  

The following points cast not just REASONABLE, but STRONG DOUBT on key points of evidence that contributed towards Aaron’s conviction for the murder of Adrian Donohoe.

My strong condolences go to the family, friends, and colleagues of Adrian Donohoe, who will be seeking justice and closure on his murder. But what follows suggests that Aaron is not your man.

Tony Brady - Father of Aaron Brady

To find justice we need to see the whole picture and we can only do that when we have all the facts.

Subscribe for updates as the case develops

Do you have information?

Use this form to contact The Brady Family directly with information relating to Aarons case

Submit your name and email to access case details